G-9J8XZFK1NF Breaking into Cybersecurity with Brad Rager - Breaking Into Cybersecurity

full

Breaking into Cybersecurity with Brad Rager

Breaking into Cybersecurity with Brad Rager

Brad Rager on Linkedin - https://www.linkedin.com/in/brad-rager/


Sponsored by CPF Coaching LLC - http://cpf-coaching.com


The Breaking into Cybersecurity: It’s a conversation about what they did before, why did they pivot into cyber, what the process was they went through Breaking Into Cybersecurity, how they keep up, and advice/tips/tricks along the way.


The Breaking into Cybersecurity Leadership Series is an additional series focused on cybersecurity leadership and hearing directly from different leaders in cybersecurity (high and low) on what it takes to be a successful leader. We focus on the skills and competencies associated with cybersecurity leadership and tips/tricks/advice from cybersecurity leaders.


This podcast runs on listener support and funding. Consider supporting this podcast:


https://breaking-into-cybersecurity.captivate.fm/support


Check out our books:


Develop Your Cybersecurity Career Path: How to Break into Cybersecurity at Any Level: https://amzn.to/3443AUI

Hack the Cybersecurity Interview: A complete interview preparation guide for jumpstarting your cybersecurity career https://www.amazon.com/dp/1801816638/


_________________________________________


About the hosts:  


Christophe Foulon focuses on helping to secure people and processes with a solid understanding of the technology involved. He has over ten years of experience as an experienced Information Security Manager and Cybersecurity Strategist with a passion for customer service, process improvement, and information security. He has significant experience in optimizing the use of technology while balancing the implications to people, processes, and information security by using a consultative approach.


https://www.linkedin.com/in/christophefoulon/


Find out more about CPF-Coaching at https://www.cpf-coaching.com


- Website: https://www.cyberhubpodcast.com/breakingintocybersecurity

- Podcast: https://feeds.captivate.fm/breaking-into-cybersecurity/

- YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/BreakingIntoCybersecurity

- Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/company/breaking-into-cybersecurity/

- Twitter: https://twitter.com/BreakintoCyber

- Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/breakingintocybersecurity

Mentioned in this episode:

Thank you to CPF Coaching for Sponsoring

CPF Coaching: Cybersecurity Leadership and Talent Development Consultant

CPF Coaching: Cybersecurity Leadership and Talent Development Consultant

Thank you to CPF Coaching for Sponsoring

Transcript
Chris:

Welcome to another episode of breaking into cybersecurity

2

:

leadership, where we talk to different

cybersecurity leaders about what we

3

:

could do to develop the next generation

of cybersecurity professionals.

4

:

Today, we have with us, Brad Rager, who

will be sharing About recruiting the next

5

:

level of cyber security professionals and.

6

:

I'll let him introduce himself.

7

:

Brad, do you want to introduce

8

:

Brad Rager: yourself to the crowd?

9

:

Sure.

10

:

Hey, thanks for having me on Chris.

11

:

Great to be here.

12

:

So yeah, I I run a startup

recruiting business called Crux.

13

:

We are building the first talent

platform for cybersecurity.

14

:

So you can think about us as both a

traditional cybersecurity recruiting

15

:

business and a marketplace.

16

:

So if you hop on Crux, you'll

be able to see the first version

17

:

of our talent marketplace.

18

:

I got started in cybersecurity

from the business side about five

19

:

years ago when I joined Optiv

where I ran corporate strategy and

20

:

was CMO for a few years as well.

21

:

So it gave me firsthand way to

view some of the challenges and

22

:

opportunities in this space.

23

:

And it led me to where I am today.

24

:

Chris: So speaking of some of the

challenges and opportunities, what

25

:

were some of the challenges and

opportunities that you first saw that

26

:

you now wanted to tackle on your own?

27

:

Brad Rager: I Think the first thing to

keep into perspective, and the reason

28

:

there are so many people that want to

be in cybersecurity is it's a field

29

:

that is, most industries go through

this S curve and we're still in the

30

:

really early stages of cybersecurity.

31

:

As more data moves online, as more of

the company's value is in their IP, their

32

:

data and their assets, the criticality of

security is only going to increase, right?

33

:

And we operate in this world where

it's this cat and mouse game.

34

:

You constantly have an adversary

that's trying to best the defenses.

35

:

So It means that the economic importance

and the risk associated with the risk

36

:

of poor cyber security hygiene, but the

economic value of protecting a company's

37

:

assets and data is only going to be more

important and it requires innovation.

38

:

It requires new talent, it requires

creative thinking, and it's

39

:

going to be driving growth for.

40

:

The foreseeable future.

41

:

So as an industry, it's an amazing

and dynamic industry to be in.

42

:

That also means there's lots

of challenges and things to

43

:

figure out along the way, right?

44

:

So I think we as an industry

have had so much coming at us.

45

:

Oftentimes it's been hard

to do things like build.

46

:

Training and development programs for

companies to bring people into and

47

:

build people's cyber security skills up.

48

:

We have just an incredible amount

of technologies that are out there.

49

:

Companies really struggle to integrate

those technologies and bring them

50

:

together and fuse kind of the people

dimension and the technology dimension.

51

:

I saw, a lot of that when I was at Optiv.

52

:

And one thing that I heard from the

folks that I worked with, CISOs and

53

:

practitioners, Was that a lot of the

pain points that they had and a lot of

54

:

the things that just weren't getting

done from a security program standpoint

55

:

wasn't because they didn't have the tools.

56

:

It was because they didn't have the

people to run the tools and follow

57

:

the processes and frankly, in many

cases, build the processes for

58

:

a robust cyber security program.

59

:

So we have a.

60

:

Significant people

challenge in this industry.

61

:

And my goal was to bring some, fresh

approaches to help customers solve

62

:

clients, solve those people challenges

and help us as an industry bring

63

:

more people into cybersecurity.

64

:

So as.

65

:

As a country, as an economy, and it's

the civilization we can be secure in what

66

:

we do online and with our businesses.

67

:

Chris: Now you've said a whole lot there.

68

:

Let's talk about how

you do things different.

69

:

So you mentioned preparing the talent

for all these new technologies.

70

:

What are some of the things that you're

doing on the front end to help prepare

71

:

Brad Rager: for that?

72

:

I.

73

:

I'm going to go to one of my pet

peeves in this industry, which is

74

:

the way job descriptions are written.

75

:

And there are so many job descriptions

that say, Hey, I've got an identity

76

:

and access management engineering

role, and they need to have.

77

:

Eight years of ForgeRock

experience, right?

78

:

And I don't know how many years ForgeRock

has been around, but it's probably

79

:

something around eight years, right?

80

:

I think there's a lot of unrealistic

expectations where people are only looking

81

:

for folks that have X number of years

experience with technology X, Y, and Z.

82

:

But the irony of all of this is

while those job descriptions are

83

:

everywhere that you look online.

84

:

Most hiring managers, when you sit down

and talk to them, would say something

85

:

along the lines of actually what I

really need is somebody who understands

86

:

the principles of IAM has a good

degree of engineering experience is a

87

:

great problem solver is hardworking.

88

:

And as if maybe they know

paying, maybe they know Octa,

89

:

maybe they know savvy, but.

90

:

That's okay.

91

:

We can teach them the ins and

outs of this particular tool.

92

:

That's not a problem, right?

93

:

And it's why don't you write

your job descriptions that way?

94

:

So I draw a few categories.

95

:

And as you think about fitting somebody

with a role, you want to balance

96

:

things across these categories.

97

:

One is what's their kind of core innate.

98

:

What are they good at?

99

:

Are they good problem solvers?

100

:

Are they good communicators?

101

:

Do they learn well?

102

:

Do they learn quickly?

103

:

Were they interested in doing

the second is what do they know?

104

:

What's their kind of knowledge base

and domain expertise, which can be

105

:

associated with the experiences that

they've had and what they've done.

106

:

And then the third set is what are

the teachable things on the job?

107

:

And in my mind, there's many tech.

108

:

knowledges, specific technologies can

fall into things that are teachable.

109

:

If you give somebody training

and time to do it, and there's

110

:

levels and degrees to that, right?

111

:

You're not going to teach somebody,

cloud infrastructure and in three months

112

:

or a month on the job, but can they

move from AWS to GCP may not be the

113

:

easiest thing in the world, but yeah,

probably most people can do that, right?

114

:

If they understand the underlying skills.

115

:

So I think there's a degree of.

116

:

flexibility and thinking that we as

an industry need to introduce into

117

:

our processes, really look more at

people's skills and not rely so heavily

118

:

on how many boxes of technologies

can I check on the job description.

119

:

And

120

:

Chris: that's, that seems like a

really hard challenge because you

121

:

have to convince hiring managers

that they have to go away from this.

122

:

Checkbox certification degree thing to

go into, Hey, these people have skills

123

:

and the skills are that they know how

to run foundational cloud technology.

124

:

They know how to run foundational

identity and access management

125

:

technology, and they just need to learn

this new one that this employer has.

126

:

How do you get them?

127

:

out of that safety net to be able to open

themselves up to hire this true talent.

128

:

Brad Rager: Yeah.

129

:

Yeah.

130

:

I think the first thing hiring managers

want is somebody who's done this

131

:

job before somewhere else, right?

132

:

That tends to be the easy button

request that you'll often get.

133

:

I actually think what happens in

the job description creation process

134

:

is a little bit more laziness than

it is malicious thinking, right?

135

:

Or not flexible thinking because so often

what happens is You don't actually find

136

:

the humans that check all of the boxes

in that job description when there's,

137

:

15 things in the required column.

138

:

And the compensation is, maybe at

or below average for the level.

139

:

Somebody ends up finding that

job or getting in that job.

140

:

That's person who finds their way in there

probably didn't check all of those boxes.

141

:

So it's a fallacy to think that there are

all of these people that are living in

142

:

these jobs that check all those boxes.

143

:

That's not happening today.

144

:

Anyways, the question is, are you going

to do that on the back end of the hiring

145

:

process in kind of a haphazard way?

146

:

Because, it's taken four months, but then

we finally went back to the well and we

147

:

found this person and okay, they're good

enough or are you going to do it at the

148

:

front end and not find somebody who's

good enough, but think strategically

149

:

about a combination of what people are

going to be able to do out of the gate.

150

:

And the potential that they

have to bring into the equation.

151

:

So from my experience, it's not

necessarily been particularly

152

:

contentious conversation.

153

:

It just requires a little bit more

thinking up front as to the problem

154

:

you're really trying to solve and what

truly is critical to have in that person.

155

:

Chris: From my perspective,

there seems to be two problems.

156

:

One forcing the site, the hiring managers

to be able to think strategically.

157

:

And then for you, Brad, having

them to do that at scale so that

158

:

you can hire at scale and help

them do those hires at scale.

159

:

How do you do that?

160

:

Brad Rager: We haven't reached

scale yet, so you'll have to ask

161

:

me in nine months or a year, Chris.

162

:

But, the concept that I go to is

Identification of people's skills, both

163

:

technical skills and non technical skills.

164

:

And if you can change the conversation

from, I want somebody who has done

165

:

XYZ for two years, five years, seven

years, eight years to, I want somebody

166

:

who knows and understands X, Y,

and Z to a certain level of depth.

167

:

And brings to the table interpersonal

communication skills, critical thinking,

168

:

they're, highly analytical, they have

a passion for understanding how things

169

:

work and breaking it apart, whatever

those things are, if you can reduce

170

:

the conversation to that level, you

will find better matches between.

171

:

People in the jobs that

are out there to be filled.

172

:

So it's just changing the conversation

of it and taking it down to the

173

:

idea of skills and saying are there

ways of assessing skills that are

174

:

a little bit more thoughtful than

yeah you say you did that before,

175

:

so you must be good at it, right?

176

:

Cause that, that oftentimes

isn't actually the case, right?

177

:

And to think about which skills

are teachable and which ones are.

178

:

Chris: And how do you help managers

with determining which skills are

179

:

teachable and which skills are not

teachable so that they can help find

180

:

those nuggets in a haystack in a resume?

181

:

Brad Rager: Yeah, I think that on

the technical side, there are great

182

:

programs and pathways out there

and certifications to take a base

183

:

level of knowledge up to more.

184

:

Advanced sets of knowledge, right?

185

:

So you can think about pick

your domain of cybersecurity.

186

:

There's sort of the one on one one oh

two one oh three one oh five version.

187

:

And there's learning both that happens

and can happen through certifications and

188

:

coursework and online programs and study,

and there's work that happens on the

189

:

job, most people learn best on the job.

190

:

So the question is.

191

:

on the technical side, what's the

level of proficiency and depth that

192

:

you need and what can they learn on

the job and what training resources

193

:

can you surround that person with to

get to the level that you want, right?

194

:

So you think about pen testing rather

than saying, I need somebody who has five

195

:

years of pen testing experience, let's,

let's see where they are on, some of the.

196

:

Tools that are out there and boards that

are out there and how they're doing and

197

:

oftentimes most pentest hiring managers

are pretty good at assessing their

198

:

kind of technical depth of knowledge.

199

:

And then you pair that with.

200

:

The things that make great pen

testers, and you can assess those

201

:

personality attributes, right?

202

:

Do they have a strong

technical inclination?

203

:

Do they have a passion to break

things down and understand

204

:

how things work, right?

205

:

Don't give me a job description

that requires that they

206

:

have a bachelor's degree.

207

:

Let's get rid of that

right out of the gate.

208

:

But let's look at the innate

personality characteristics that

209

:

tend to fit well with that role.

210

:

if You have somebody that doesn't

demonstrate that through their

211

:

passions, their history, their action

or communication, it's probably less

212

:

likely that they're going to grow

into that path that sort of fits well

213

:

with a certain type of personality.

214

:

If that makes sense.

215

:

I do think there are

things in general that.

216

:

are more coachable and more capable of

developing than things that are not right.

217

:

You it's difficult to take somebody who

just doesn't have a lot of curiosity and

218

:

make them a curious person, for instance.

219

:

That, those are the kinds of things

you really want to talk through.

220

:

Chris: You brought up.

221

:

How do you test for curiosity or

how do you pull curiosity out of

222

:

a candidate during a conversation?

223

:

Yeah.

224

:

Brad Rager: There's, with anything,

there's multiple ways to get at it.

225

:

There's one method, which is A

little bit more quantifiable.

226

:

So we use personality inventories and

assessments that give a general dynamic

227

:

of, Hey, does, where does this person

fall on introversion, extroversion, where

228

:

do they fall on, somebody who loves to

go by the rules versus break the rules.

229

:

There's a bunch of

different elements to that.

230

:

So you can get.

231

:

One read from personality assessments,

but you can't necessarily take

232

:

that as gospel, so to speak.

233

:

Then you really get at

it through conversation.

234

:

So if you're testing for curiosity

and if you're testing for somebody

235

:

who really wants to understand

the guts of things, then.

236

:

You ask them what their passions are.

237

:

You ask them what they're interested in.

238

:

You ask them what they

do in their spare time.

239

:

That's when the hobbies

actually are very relevant.

240

:

You look and see if they have a

portfolio, if you will, of things

241

:

that they've done to demonstrate

that passion and that interest.

242

:

And just that simple idea of a

passion around a given area, that.

243

:

Can take you miles, right?

244

:

Most good hiring managers that I know,

many of them will look for that as their

245

:

first and foremost thing and say, if

I can find somebody who is hungry and

246

:

curious and eager to learn and spends

their time building their own knowledge

247

:

in this space, rather than somebody who's

just looking for a paycheck or saying,

248

:

Hey, I'm getting in this field because I

hear there's a lot of money to be made.

249

:

Most people are looking for that

person that really loves the topic

250

:

and is hungry and, is putting

themselves out in that community.

251

:

And by the way, that's like the best

way to get a job too, because it is

252

:

tough in this current market to just.

253

:

Click through job boards and apply to jobs

if you have a passion around a given topic

254

:

if you put yourself into that Community of

interest if you engage and contribute not

255

:

only does that help build your knowledge

base But it gives you opportunity to meet

256

:

people and some of those people might

need to hire somebody or know somebody

257

:

that might need to hire Somebody so

positioned you really well for finding

258

:

a job to you in this current market

259

:

How do you

260

:

Chris: test for that drive that someone

that's really hungry versus someone

261

:

that is just looking for it on paper?

262

:

What sort of off screen tests or

questions do you drive into to find those

263

:

Brad Rager: answers?

264

:

Yeah, drive is something that is a

little bit more difficult to measure

265

:

through an assessment or a test.

266

:

In my mind, you really dig into it

starts with something as simple as Tell

267

:

me why you want to go into the space

or tell me about your career path.

268

:

Tell me about the decisions

that you've made and the choices

269

:

that you've made along the way.

270

:

And then you can dig into it and

ask why questions underneath that.

271

:

And what you're trying to get at is what

is the motivation and the driver and

272

:

Individuals level of self awareness in

their journey of self discovery, right?

273

:

I don't expect everybody, and I think

it's just human nature to people don't

274

:

always know exactly what they want to do.

275

:

And I think that's fine to me.

276

:

What matters.

277

:

More almost is are you actively part

of a journey of self discovery where

278

:

you are trying things and you are

finding things that you love and

279

:

that you're good at and then you're

doubling down in those areas, right?

280

:

And if you can form a story and

demonstrate that with things that

281

:

you've done or things that you've

learned or where you're spending your

282

:

time in those areas that you love.

283

:

That's great, right?

284

:

So to me, that comes out through

storytelling and through unpacking

285

:

a person's career path, decision

making, and the things that they

286

:

do to build their own career.

287

:

Chris: Any frameworks that you would

recommend for candidates to use to

288

:

really be able to pull that out?

289

:

Brad Rager: That's a great question.

290

:

I don't think I have any.

291

:

Frameworks offhand.

292

:

The, when we kind of classify

folks by their areas of expertise

293

:

within cybersecurity, we'll use

the, this nice framework, which

294

:

is a great framework, but it has.

295

:

I think 140 different job types.

296

:

So in some ways it's almost too

detailed, but you can roll that up to

297

:

the major domains or disciplines within

security, GRC, pen testing, IR cloud

298

:

security app stack, things like that.

299

:

And that kind of, to me sits at the level

of a good spot where you can really drive.

300

:

Domain expertise.

301

:

It in many ways aligns with a lot of

the certifications that are out there,

302

:

but I think it's also okay to build

skills across domains, not just within

303

:

domains, because the more senior you

have this kind of paradox, right?

304

:

As a junior person or a

person in a smaller company.

305

:

As a security expert, you're

gonna be doing everything right

306

:

or a lot of different things.

307

:

You go to a big company

as a junior person.

308

:

You may be very specialized.

309

:

Then as you get more senior once again,

you really have to have a generalist

310

:

perspective on security and be able

to operate across domains, identify

311

:

relative risk in various domains and

work across a business to make sure

312

:

that security hygiene is embedded.

313

:

Across all the stakeholders

in the company.

314

:

So moving across domains and disciplines

and building generous knowledge and

315

:

CISSP type broad knowledge of security.

316

:

That's great, too.

317

:

What I would ask an individual is

where do they feel comfortable?

318

:

What do they want to do?

319

:

Are you a person that wants to go super

deep and build really, strong domain

320

:

expertise in one particular area?

321

:

And bring that potentially to multiple

companies over the course of your career.

322

:

Or are you a person who likes to see

things from a bigger picture, operate

323

:

at a more strategic level or build a lot

of variety and build a, just a really

324

:

strong set of experiences across things.

325

:

There's a need for both types of people,

but I would encourage somebody to think

326

:

about who they are and what makes them

tick and what do they enjoy doing.

327

:

And then it built career

experiences that align with that

328

:

philosophy for that approach.

329

:

Chris: Yeah one of the frameworks that

I was hinting to was like the STAR

330

:

format with situation, task, action,

reaction to try to pull out what

331

:

exactly they did within a situation.

332

:

And I know that's a great

one, but there's others.

333

:

Yes.

334

:

Brad Rager: To your point, I think

that when you're going through

335

:

somebody's experience in the

background, you can't just be content

336

:

to take a thing at face value.

337

:

I like to dig in and say, all

right, what was the context?

338

:

What was the problem you

were trying to solve?

339

:

That question can get to ability

to see context and bigger

340

:

picture and strategic thinking.

341

:

And then to understand as part of a team

or as an individual, what did you do?

342

:

What did you contribute?

343

:

What value did you bring to the table?

344

:

Cause let's be honest, people will

embellish on their resumes and oftentimes

345

:

a lot of team accomplishments get, get

tasked as an individual accomplishment.

346

:

So you're also trying to assess for

that and really understand how did

347

:

you contribute within this team?

348

:

What did you bring to the table?

349

:

And we know that it's always a team

game, but you have to you have to

350

:

dig in to really understand that.

351

:

And it doesn't always pop out.

352

:

That's a good framework.

353

:

Chris: Now, for those that don't

understand the difference between

354

:

recruiters, hiring managers,

internal recruiters, sourcers,

355

:

things like that would you want

to describe how you're structured

356

:

and how they might be different?

357

:

Brad Rager: Yeah, absolutely.

358

:

Recruiter tends to be the person on

the front end who is bringing a person

359

:

into a situation or an opportunity.

360

:

There are external recruiters and

there are internal recruiters.

361

:

External recruiters are engaged by a

company to find talent on their behalf.

362

:

That could be contract talent.

363

:

It could be.

364

:

Full time talent.

365

:

It depends on the nature of the

opportunity, but you're basically

366

:

acting as a representative

or an agent for that company.

367

:

And you're trying to find

somebody who's a great man.

368

:

Companies will look to external folks

because they can bring a network.

369

:

They can bring particular

domain expertise, really from

370

:

a hiring manager's perspective.

371

:

They want to help finding

great people and finding them.

372

:

quickly.

373

:

So that's the value proposition

of an external recruiter.

374

:

Internal recruiters work

on behalf of a company.

375

:

What you tend to find in our industry

is the quality and the strength of

376

:

those internal recruiters, whether they

really understand the job to be done

377

:

will vary and it tends to vary where.

378

:

If the company is a cybersecurity company,

a tech company, or cybersecurity services

379

:

company, typically those recruiters have

a pretty good understanding of the job and

380

:

the job to be done, and they can represent

that well when talking to a candidate.

381

:

In enterprise, that's often

tougher because you may have a.

382

:

Food manufacturing company or an

aerospace company or a hospital

383

:

hiring a cybersecurity person.

384

:

And that's where the conversations can

get a little bit challenging because

385

:

that recruiter will struggle to play

the translation layer between the

386

:

candidates and the hiring managers.

387

:

And so in, in my line of

business, we mostly work with

388

:

enterprises to help solve that gap.

389

:

And.

390

:

Bring that expertise into the hiring

equation, but then really the decision

391

:

making at the end of the day is with

the hiring manager, because that's

392

:

going to be the person who is the

boss and who is building the team.

393

:

And so I think a good

recruiter works both ways.

394

:

They work with the hiring manager.

395

:

The front end of our conversation,

Chris, to say, what's the

396

:

problem you're trying to solve?

397

:

What are the skills that you really need?

398

:

What's the type of person who's going to

be really successful, not just in this

399

:

role, but in this company, who what's the

culture like, and then you can go out and

400

:

you may know that person who would be a

great fit already within your network.

401

:

Or you can help find that

person on behalf of a client.

402

:

And that's really the job of,

403

:

Chris: and with regards to your

experience of how efficient

404

:

one is in each of those roles.

405

:

I know that each served their own

purpose, but, if I were a client,

406

:

would I look out for those external

recruiters, those internal recruiters?

407

:

Who do I try to reach out to if I'm

doing an outbound campaign looking

408

:

for a recruiter that might be able to

fill a spot that I'm looking to fill?

409

:

Brad Rager: Yeah great question.

410

:

I think if you're a hiring

manager and you've got a great

411

:

recruiting team internally in your

company, that's fantastic, right?

412

:

And that's gonna be the most cost

efficient route from an individual,

413

:

hire basis most of the time,

if you've got a good recruiter.

414

:

Now, if you're struggling to find people,

actually not having good recruiting

415

:

capabilities can be very costly because

the cost of a bad hire, Is really high.

416

:

You think about the time that is lost

getting the work done or the cultural

417

:

issues that happen when you make a

hiring mistake, that's really the value

418

:

proposition of having a good recruiter.

419

:

So I think it starts

with an assessment of.

420

:

Do I know people and network?

421

:

How long?

422

:

How hard will this be to find

a great person for our team?

423

:

And then from there you want to think

about, okay if, if the principal

424

:

criteria are finding a great person

and finding them quickly, you want

425

:

to go with companies or recruiters

that understand the space, understand

426

:

the nature of the job to be done.

427

:

We'll take the time to work with you

and understand exactly what you're

428

:

looking for and what you need so that.

429

:

You don't have to spend a lot of time

saying, yes, this person needs this.

430

:

No, this person doesn't.

431

:

And that's where I think.

432

:

Our industry and there's a lot of

recruiters out there that look at this

433

:

very transactionally and they'll say,

give me a job description and I will go,

434

:

spam 1000 people on linked in and try and

check as many of these boxes as possible.

435

:

And then I'll flip it back over to you.

436

:

To me, that's totally.

437

:

Totally the wrong framework.

438

:

This is about people and

this is about relationships.

439

:

And there are there's brand to

be built on both sides, right?

440

:

As a recruiter, the best thing

you can do for a client is help

441

:

them with their people strategy,

help them find great people.

442

:

And the best thing you can do for

candidates is help them find a place

443

:

that they are going to thrive and grow.

444

:

And that is in line with what they want.

445

:

So I think you got to take.

446

:

A long term perspective as you think

about those relationships, and that's

447

:

why, the quality of the experience

on both sides really matters.

448

:

And in the poor behavior around

hosting and stuff like that, it just

449

:

it gives our industry a bad name.

450

:

And it.

451

:

It's a shame that it's right.

452

:

We shouldn't treat folks like numbers.

453

:

Everybody's special, everybody's

individual, and it's our

454

:

job to get to know people.

455

:

Chris: And as we wrap up, any final

advice you'd give to candidates that are

456

:

hunting for a role in this job market?

457

:

Brad Rager: Yeah.

458

:

Yeah.

459

:

Look, I think this job market is the most

challenging that the cybersecurity job

460

:

market has been at least in the past 5

to 10 years where you used to see jobs

461

:

going up that would get 5 applicants.

462

:

Now the same job is going

to get 100 or 100 to 50.

463

:

So it's a challenging market and Yeah.

464

:

What I've seen is a number of

people that have been able to

465

:

go from job to job in the past.

466

:

Maybe they got recruited out of a

company and now they're saying, okay.

467

:

I've got to go do this job search and

I've almost got to run it like a job.

468

:

And we posted a few blogs on my

website recently just to give some

469

:

tactical guidance around this.

470

:

But the best thing I would say is in this

sounds cliche, but it really is true.

471

:

Network is super important, but there is

a methodology that you can apply towards.

472

:

Leaning on your network and growing

your network in such a way that

473

:

it is maximally likely to help

you land a job that you like.

474

:

And that really involves engaging

people that you know, having a very

475

:

crisp story on what you want to do,

so you can help people help you.

476

:

And then people make introductions.

477

:

And so if you go into the

process with a really crisp.

478

:

Narrative on what you're good at, what

you want to do, and you understand

479

:

the types of companies or specific

companies that you would want to work at.

480

:

You can build a network and help find

your way to get to meet people that

481

:

are inside those companies or that

are likely to be hiring managers.

482

:

And then just knowing somebody

totally flips the odds of you

483

:

being able to get an interview.

484

:

And then from there, run the process

and do what you're good at and

485

:

trying to bring out your strengths.

486

:

But that's the challenge that

so many people are having is.

487

:

They're dropping applications online.

488

:

They're getting rejections.

489

:

They don't understand why it's

happening over and over again, even

490

:

for jobs that are qualified with.

491

:

So in this market, if you're seeking

and you're hunting, it does require

492

:

that extra above and beyond effort.

493

:

To build network and get

referred into those jobs.

494

:

Chris: Well, Brad,

thank you for coming on.

495

:

Thank you for sharing

your tips and tricks.

496

:

Really appreciate it.

497

:

We'll definitely have you back on again

in the near future and maybe we'll

498

:

have some of your success candidates

come on and share their journey

499

:

and share their Brad experience.

500

:

Getting through this market,

but all thank you for joining.

501

:

Thank you for all the

questions and comments.

502

:

We really appreciate it.

503

:

Feel free to share this with others that

might be interested because that's the

504

:

whole point of these episodes is to share

it with those that are also looking to

505

:

break in and are looking to learn from the

tips and tricks of individuals like Brad.

506

:

Brad Rager: Thanks so much, Chris.

507

:

Great chat with you.

508

:

Thank you all.

About the Podcast

Show artwork for Breaking Into Cybersecurity
Breaking Into Cybersecurity
Developing cyber pros of the future!

About your host

Profile picture for Christophe Foulon

Christophe Foulon

It’s a conversation about what you did before, why did you pivot into cyber, what the process you went through Breaking Into Cybersecurity, how you keep up, and advice/tips/tricks along the way. You can also bring up topics like attraction/retention/developing the next generation of the workforce.

Cybersecurity Leaders, we would love to help develop the next generation of cybersecurity leadership. We will do us on the critical skills and competencies of leadership, and you can also bring up topics like attraction, retention, and developing the next generation of the workforce.

Let me know if you are interested and available email - breakingintocyber@gmail.com

Love Breaking into Cybersecurity? Tips help keep overhead low

Love Breaking into Cybersecurity? Tips help keep overhead low and allow us to produce more valuable content.
Tip now to support Breaking into Cybersecurity!
A
We haven’t had any Tips yet :( Maybe you could be the first!